0% completed
The State design pattern enables an object's behavior to change when its internal state changes. This pattern is used to encapsulate varying behavior for the same routine based on the object's state, allowing an object to change its behavior at runtime without resorting to large conditional statements.
Consider the music player app. The music player can be in any of the following states: stopped, paused, or playing. Depending on the player's current condition, different behaviors are displayed by the buttons labeled "play," "pause," "stop," and "next." It can be difficult and challenging to maintain this implementation when there are a lot of conditional statements, especially when more states or actions are added.
Solution: The State pattern recommends developing distinct classes that implement the same interface or abstract class for each state of the music player, such as PlayingState
, PausedState
, and StoppedState
. The behavior is delegated to the current state object by the MusicPlayer class, which keeps track of it. The Music Player modifies the state object it refers to when the state changes.
Consider a system of traffic lights. There are three possible states for the traffic light: red, green, or yellow. Each state requires a distinct set of actions:
The traffic light's behavior varies in accordance with the precise sequence in which it changes states—from Red to Green to Yellow to Red.
The key components of the class diagram include:
handleRequest()
and other methods.The class diagram shows the Context class having a reference to the State interface and the Concrete State classes implementing the State interface. The interaction between the Context and the Concrete States encapsulates the state-dependent behavior.
Let's take the example of a Document class that can be in different states: Draft, Moderation, and Published.
// State Interface interface State { void publish(document) void approve(document) } // Concrete States class Draft implements State { void publish(document) { document.state = new Moderation() } void approve(document) { // Draft cannot be approved directly } } class Moderation implements State { void publish(document) { // Cannot publish from Moderation without approval } void approve(document) { document.state = new Published() } } class Published implements State { void publish(document) { // Already published } void approve(document) { // Already approved } } // Context Class class Document { State state = new Draft() void publish() { state.publish(this) } void approve() { state.approve(this) } } // Usage document = new Document() document.publish() // Changes state to Moderation document.approve() // Changes state to Published
publish
, approve
).In each of these applications, the State pattern contributes to a cleaner, more organized, and maintainable codebase by encapsulating state-specific behaviors and facilitating state transitions in a controlled manner.
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Encapsulates State-Specific Behavior: Each state's behavior is in its class. | Increased Number of Classes: More classes to manage for each state. |
Easier Maintenance: Adding new states or changing behaviors doesn't require modifying existing states. | Context-Dependency: States are dependent on the context, making them less reusable. |
Eliminates Complex Conditional Logic: Avoids conditional complexity in the context class. | Complexity: Initial setup and understanding of the pattern can be complex. |
Improves Readability: Clear structure for state transitions. | Overhead: Additional overhead in terms of memory and runtime for small use cases. |
The State design pattern is an effective tool for managing state-dependent behavior in a clean and maintainable manner. It's especially helpful when an object's behavior varies greatly depending on its state. Understanding this pattern can significantly reduce the complexity of code structure in complex systems.
.....
.....
.....